Surviving Al Gore-aphobia

Try as we may, we just can’t rid ourselves of Al Gore and if there was ever anybody who deserves to be left on history’s trash pile, it’s the esteemed former vice president. But the man who forced the phrase “hanging chad” into the American lexicon, and hence made a debacle of the 2000 US Presidential race, continues to be foisted upon us by a fawning cadre of left wing activists. 

Unless you have been living under a rock, you are no doubt aware that Gore is now being hailed as a near modern-day “prophet” as his qausi-documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” continues to gain notoriety despite its penchant for, well, treating the truth rather inconveniently.

Gore’s latest effort, which consists of trying to scare the daylights out of unsuspecting and gullible citizens into believing that we are in the midst of a cataclysmic global warming emergency, stands as a monument to an empty shell of a man desperate to be taken seriously. After all, Gore has had problems with the truth for many years. Facts, like the truth, Gore should have learned by now, can be not only inconvenient, but downright stubborn.

This is the same man, after all, who:

  • Declared during the 2000 presidential race that the soppy, but classic, novel “Love Story” was based on him and his wife Tipper. Author Eric Segal quickly refuted that ridiculous assertion.
  • Stated that legislation he supported while a US Senator in 1989 led to the development of the Internet. The Internet actually came into being back in 1969.
  • Claimed that as President his cabinet would reflect his Senate staff, which he stated consisted of 50% females, but when challenged could not initially name a single female member of his staff and then when he finally remembered, got her name wrong.

So should we be surprised therefore when his latest effort is basically loaded with lies and half-truths?

Gore claims in “An Inconvenient Truth” that a “sampling” of 928 scholarly scientific articles revealed 100% agreement on man made global warming. Hmmm…sure, anybody can cherry pick articles that support a position and then declare unanimous agreement. But tell that to Dr. Richard Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT and the lead author of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Lindzen, a real expert on climate change, recently noted that “Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early twenty-first century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exagerations of highly uncertain computer projections combine into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age.” 

Dr. Lindzen’s point is well taken and points out the danger of making decisions based on junk science.

The world has experienced climate changes long before the industrialization and evil machinations of the United States. Did you ever hear of the Medieval Warm Period? Probably not but from 800-1300 AD the world experienced mild warming too but it is not likely that Leif Ericson was forced to give up his SUV. Also the world has experienced cooling periods, some considering the period of 1945-1975 such a recent time.  Of course you won’t find this mentioned in Gore’s deceptive little film. What you will find are scare tactics and downright lies.

The “highlight” of “An Inconvenient Truth” comes when two polar bears are seen drifting away on an ice float supposedly broken away from the polar ice caps that are melting. This is a complete fabrication. First, it is a computer generated graphic but even more damming, it is actually doctored from a 2004 photo when the bears climbed upon the supposed ice float which was actually created by the ocean’s waves. The bears safely explored it, climbed off and managed to swim back to their home. Go figure. But that little bit of trickery and deception has been enough to panic schoolchildren everywhere who are now being indoctrinated into the global warming temple of doom.

Schools are using Gore’s film to “teach” about global warming. Children are coming home crying because they think the polar bears are dying because mommy and daddy don’t care about what they are doing to the environment. Schools are sending kids home with “global warming worksheets” containing lectures on how they can be responsible global citizens.

Some point to the fact that Gore’s little effort won the Academy Award for Best Documentary as validation of its legitimacy. Sure, an award conferred upon it by Hollywood, the land of make believe and plastic surgery is a sign of validation.  Actually, that is quite appropriate after all.

Fortunately, some schools and parents are fighting back. The National Science Teachers Association recently rejected 50,000 free copies of “An Inconvenient Truth” because it recognizes it for what it is, primarily a propaganda piece for the radical environmental crowd. One student even recently took matters into his own hands when his school was presenting the film, bringing a universal remote control to school to disrupt the show.  There is hope.

But in the meantime we have to put up with the endless drone of the environmental activists telling us how evil we are and that we in the United States are nearly the sole cause of supposed global warming. Just ask singer Sheryl Crow.

Crow is currently doing the college tour, performing and lecturing about global warming. She has not addressed the fact however that her tour consists of three diesel fuel churning tractor trailers, four buses and six cars in her cross-country caravan, all, according to the global warming mainfesto, key contributors to global warming.

Hypocrisy is apparently a primary tenet of environmental activism. Well suited to the likes of Al Gore. 

Explore posts in the same categories: Environment, Global Warming

5 Comments on “Surviving Al Gore-aphobia”

  1. What if YOU are flat out wrong 30 years from now?

  2. Mike Richmond Says:

    Yeah, what if Al Gore really did invent the internet?

  3. jerryselleck Says:

    Dave: great article. But the bottom line here is that Al is trying to find a ladder to climb back to the top. I would like to see a collaboration between Michael Moore and Al Gore. We could call it ‘A Convenient Smear.’
    The response from Steve Roberts basically says “we don’t know the truth, but just to be on the safe side, let’s assume Al is right.” He’d rather live with Al being wrong, rather than you being wrong. That is SO intelligent! Don’t need any facts or analysis. Unfortunately, Steve represents a good percentage of the citizenry, who don’t have time for facts. We are content to be swayed by polar bear bytes. By the way, polar bears are excellent swimmers, and can pretty much go where they want. It takes more than an errant ice floe to kill one off. Ask an eskimo.

  4. Deb R Says:

    What if Dave is right 30 years from now?

    I choose to believe that Al Gore, Michael Moore, and Sheryl Crow are all wrong. Just because they are famous doesn’t make them right. I am 55 years old and I have seen all kinds of weather changes in my short lifetime. In the big picture of the world, isn’t it conceivable that there is a natural ebb and flow to the weather pattern over millions and millions of years?

  5. Brett Says:

    Hysteria and the media go hand in hand. Hot topics blown to the outer limits of possibility and social activism go hand in hand. Gore has found a band-wagon to jump on, one that is bound for ultimate media exposure.

    Al has said some dumb things in the past, and there’s not much else he’s said to gain my belief in him as an authority on anything, or an effective tool for change or progress, especially in the area of global warming, if that’s even an issue. To be fair, I don’t discredit every current word from Al’s mouth because of previous idiocies. Those make for a poor argument as a point, but do offer little in the way of trust of further points.

    Therefore I do not distrust theories of global warming because Al Gore claimed he invented the internet, or however that was worded. I distrust it because of logic, reason, an the on-going debate between experts. It has gained widespread acceptance because of media coverage, which is another thing I distrust. When a few year’s data is used to extrapolate widespread global devastation, I become immediately sceptical. 30 years ago, there was a Newsweek article about global cooling. Some claim new science has shown this to be false. Some claim.

    The jury is still out as far as I am concerned. Now is not the time for fear tactics and mass hysteria. Responsible conservation is fine and a good policy in general, I believe. Shame on Al for taking up a torch I believe has only personal gain as a motive.

    History is littered with prophecies of doom and gloom which never came to pass. The “never cry wolf” sensor in my brain is flashing red here. I know a guy who probably has many cases of soup and peanut butter in his basement. He was told that when we invaded Iraq gas prices would go above $3, and $3 was the economic limit for trucking industry profitability and therefore all cross-country shipping would cease. He urged everyone he met to begin stock-piling immediately. I suspect he has alot of unused duct tape from the milennium computer scare as well.

    Remember when eggs were bad because they had cholesterol? Remember when eggs were absolved of guilt years later when they found out there was good and bad cholesterol? I am not saying it’s the same thing, but I am saying that scientific propositions should not be taken as truth, held up as unrefutable reasons for social change, and used to further a political career.

Leave a Reply to steverobertsphotography Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: